Prepare the data
Collect a table with model inputs plus one or more protected-group columns and clear labels; check for missingness and class imbalance per subgroup.
Detect bias in classifiers. Interpret feature contributions.
Bias detection in classification models aims to find performance or decision differences across subgroups defined by protected attributes. Practical checks include subgroup metrics, calibration per group, and explanation stability; missing or biased labels and absent subgroup data are common failure modes.
Learning concept · Not a validated service
Bias detection in classification models aims to find performance or decision differences across subgroups defined by protected attributes. Practical checks include subgroup metrics, calibration per group, and explanation stability; missing or biased labels and absent subgroup data are common failure modes.
A proposed use: augment model audits by computing subgroup performance and explanation stability so a human reviewer can decide if a deployed classifier requires mitigation. This project does not deliver a full audit dashboard or automated mitigation.
Collect a table with model inputs plus one or more protected-group columns and clear labels; check for missingness and class imbalance per subgroup.
Fit a reproducible classifier pipeline on training data and retain a held-out test set stratified by target and subgroup.
Compute feature importances and SHAP values, then compare explanation distributions across subgroups to spot disparate drivers.
Report accuracy, precision/recall, and calibration per subgroup and flag large gaps for human review.
The supplied starter generates a synthetic classification dataset with make_classification, fits a RandomForestClassifier, and computes permutation feature importances on the test set. It does not create or evaluate protected-group labels, subgroup metrics, fairness measures, or mitigation strategies.
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=700, n_features=8, n_informative=5, random_state=42)
columns = [f"feature_{i}" for i in range(X.shape[1])]
X = pd.DataFrame(X, columns=columns)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.25, random_state=42, stratify=y)
model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=250, random_state=42)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
importance = permutation_importance(model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10, random_state=42)
report = pd.DataFrame({"feature": columns, "importance": importance.importances_mean})
report = report.sort_values("importance", ascending=False)The starter uses synthetic features with no protected-group attributes and reports only overall accuracy plus permutation importances. It lacks subgroup labels, fairness metrics (e.g. demographic parity, equalised odds), calibration checks, and explanation comparisons required for a true bias-detection workflow.
A proposed extension: replace the synthetic data with a labelled real dataset that includes protected-group columns, compute per-group metrics and calibration, and add SHAP-based explanation comparisons and statistical tests for fairness gaps.
This is a potential application pathway, not a delivered product. The supplied starter does not implement this service or validate it with real users.
Networkers Home runs this topic inside its AI Engineer Course, with placement support and hands-on labs.