Prepare user and item data
Collect interaction data, holdings or preference signals and standardise item metadata (asset class, risk measures), then split into training and test periods that respect time ordering.
Recommend portfolios to users. Weigh similar users' choices.
A robo-advisor recommender suggests investment items or portfolio allocations by combining behaviour, item metadata and context. Common practical issues are sparse user feedback, evolving market regimes, and safety constraints such as concentration limits and mandatory diversification.
Learning concept · Not a validated service
A robo-advisor recommender suggests investment items or portfolio allocations by combining behaviour, item metadata and context. Common practical issues are sparse user feedback, evolving market regimes, and safety constraints such as concentration limits and mandatory diversification.
A proposed application: an exploratory recommender for retail investors that suggests candidate funds or allocations for human review. Because this concerns financial advice, a qualified human must review and approve any recommendation before action; the starter code does not implement such controls.
Collect interaction data, holdings or preference signals and standardise item metadata (asset class, risk measures), then split into training and test periods that respect time ordering.
Implement a simple user-based or item-based collaborative filter (cosine or Pearson) as a reproducible baseline before trying factorisation models.
Measure offline ranking metrics (precision@k, recall@k) and also domain metrics such as portfolio concentration, simulated Sharpe or drawdown on suggested allocations.
Apply business rules (exposure caps, excluded assets), add fallback logic, capture human feedback and monitoring for drift before serving recommendations.
The supplied starter builds a tiny toy ratings table of users and generic items, pivots to a user-item matrix, computes user-to-user cosine similarity, finds the most similar user to a target, and recommends items that the neighbour rated but the target has not. It uses no financial data, no portfolio allocations, and no safety or economic metrics.
matrix = ratings.pivot_table(index="user", columns="item", values="rating").fillna(0)
user_similarity = pd.DataFrame(
cosine_similarity(matrix),
index=matrix.index,
columns=matrix.index,
)
target_user = "user_1"
neighbor = user_similarity[target_user].drop(target_user).idxmax()
unseen_items = matrix.loc[target_user][matrix.loc[target_user] == 0].index
scores = matrix.loc[neighbor, unseen_items].sort_values(ascending=False)This starter uses a six-user toy ratings table of generic 'items', not assets, holdings or portfolio allocations. It performs a single-step user-based collaborative-filter recommendation with no financial features, risk-aware constraints, time-aware validation, backtesting or economic evaluation. Results from this toy example are not meaningful for investment decisions.
A proposed extension: replace toy ratings with anonymised portfolio holdings or ETF selection history, compute user similarity on risk-adjusted returns and metadata, and add rule-based exposure limits and a human-in-the-loop approval interface.
This is a potential application pathway, not a delivered product. The supplied starter does not implement this service or validate it with real users.
Networkers Home runs this topic inside its AI Engineer Course, with placement support and hands-on labs.